This is the report of the Board of Education degree course was held Friday, November 27 ...
"having no time to do a detailed report of the Committee at this time, I tell you just what is the proposal that was made yesterday by Zucchi and that will be proposed for discussion by the Board of Faculty (Monday) and Councils of degree program and faculty Tuesday afternoon at 16.30 and 17.30 respectively. brackets yesterday there were about ten students who have willingly assisted in the discussions and we asked them to attend as listeners Zucchi, from which he Chairman of the Committee could easily authorize, but he refused. He told them about for a few minutes before the committee and answered a few questions, basically implying that brought a block of 3 to 4 years .. but then when it came out that the Committee:
Zucchi wants to put three dams (ie, impediments to enroll, attend lectures and take their exams the following year)
between 1 and 2 years
between 3 and 4 years
between 5 and 6 years
organized as follows: for
go from 1 to 2 years should have made at least 5 exams to 7 (excluding perhaps from English and computer account, and we also propose to exclude human sciences). It means that if one does not has such chemistry, biology and histology lose a whole year to "recover", and we think it is absurd because it loses more time than they need to recover.
to spend 3 to 4 years should have done all the tests 1 and 2 plus at least two exams in the first half of the 3 years.
to go from 5 to 6 years should have done all the exams at least a few more years of 1,2,3,4, 5, can not remember if 2 or 3.
What individuals?
For all those who sign up next year: all the barriers described above.
for all those who are now enrolled in the first year: all dams except that between 1 and 2 years, I think.
for all those who are now enrolled in the second year would be worth only a barrier between 3 and 4 years, but a little 'less drastic than it is for others, that is to go to four years should give all the tests first and second year.
Why propose this? here's what she said Prof. Zucchi
statistics shows that currently 60% of all examinations of the first year by September and another 20% is only a test, then where is the "need" to put the dam the first year? Answer:
since this year there is also anatomia1 the first year, Zucchi afraid that all left behind with anatomy, and then if the drag behind accumulating delay. But in our block with the result that we all try to give all other examinations, which are smaller, leaving behind their anatomy, thus not getting the desired result, and even at the risk of losing people a year in fees and time if can not go to 2 years. One reason for asking people to give anatomy (second half) to force in July or September esageratissimo.
For the four years, now many come to four years without having given all the exams of two years and one of the culprits clearly is always the question of anatomy. So to "stimulate", he said, to give students anatomy, physiology and pathology before ending the three years, this block offers Zucchi.
Between 5 and 6 years: now it happens that many people, to say the prof, he graduated without ever having attended the courses of six years because it is in the sixth year at home and tries to retrieve previous examinations. So to force people to catch up, and then follow the courses of 6, who would be most important in order to really learn to be a doctor by integrating the knowledge gained, the proposed block. Personally I have not followed the course of 6 and still do not know if "worth it", that is, if you really make something important for your understanding. If courses were done well the speech can have a sense if they were maybe a course that would not follow, however, the speech has not much sense.
However, we voted against the proposal because I think the barriers are in general a "solution" excessive and effectively to a problem that really exists, but that depends on other (if people fall behind with anatomy is concerned because it is a enormous, and wherever we put it, the problem remains, if the examination is such and such .. and in general if we are back to me is why certain tests are excessive compared to what we would learn, and why we're losing so much time in unimportant things and in bureaucracies and important ones are not always clear).
Other problems:
eg if we consider only the exams until September, the appeal in December is no longer considered valid in order to "stay the course", but belongs to the previous academic year! then all the representatives of the students were unanimous in one another that would appeal to the end of October, at a minimum! but pumpkin is not very favorable.
there are other things but now I am a bit 'on the run, will add later. Hello!
0 comments:
Post a Comment